CodeCat
Deeper code reviews. Specialist AI reviewers for every quality dimension.. We use specialist AI agents instead of generic bots to catch what humans miss.
Works seamlessly with
The Cost of Bad Code
Manual code reviews are slow, fatigue-prone, and often miss critical flaws. Generic AI bots just add noise.
Security Breaches
Vulnerabilities slip through when reviewers are rushing.
Bottlenecks
PRs sit for days waiting for a senior engineer's approval.
Shallow Scans
Generic bots only catch syntax errors, missing deep logic flaws.
Tech Debt
Without consistent architectural review, codebases degrade.
How it works
Zero friction. Maximum insight.
1. Open a Pull Request
CodeCat automatically detects new PRs and code pushes. There are no webhooks to configure or CI/CD pipelines to modify. Just install the GitHub app and write code.
2. AI Agents Analyze
CodeCat orchestrates a matrix of specialist AI models. The Security agent checks for vulnerabilities, while the Performance agent looks for bottlenecks. They run in parallel, finishing in seconds.
3. Actionable Feedback
Feedback is posted directly to your GitHub PR as structured, native comments. CodeCat explains the "why" and provides the exact code to fix it.
CodeCat Bot just now
Critical Security Issue: This raw query is vulnerable to SQL injection. Use parameterized queries instead.
Meet the Matrix
CodeCat doesn't rely on a single general model. We orchestrate a team of specialist AI agents that run in parallel.
Security Agent
Hunts for injection flaws, XSS, CSRF, auth bypasses, and exposed secrets.
Performance Agent
Identifies N+1 queries, unnecessary renders, and memory bottlenecks.
Architecture Agent
Enforces clean code, separation of concerns, and system boundaries.
CodeCat Does It Better
Trusted by developers who care about code quality
Sarah Chen
@sarahcodes
CodeCat caught a SQL injection I missed in review. It's like having a senior security engineer on every PR.
Priya Sharma
@psharma_dev
Every PR now has structured AI feedback before a human even looks at it. Review velocity tripled.
Elena Vasquez
@evasquez
Performance reviewer caught an N+1 query on day one. Paid for itself immediately.
Nadia Kowalski
@nadiak
Onboarding new engineers is faster now. CodeCat explains why something is bad, not just that it is.
Sophie Martin
@smartin_dev
I stopped dreading code review. CodeCat handles the tedious pattern checks and I focus on logic.
Sarah Chen
@sarahcodes
CodeCat caught a SQL injection I missed in review. It's like having a senior security engineer on every PR.
Priya Sharma
@psharma_dev
Every PR now has structured AI feedback before a human even looks at it. Review velocity tripled.
Elena Vasquez
@evasquez
Performance reviewer caught an N+1 query on day one. Paid for itself immediately.
Nadia Kowalski
@nadiak
Onboarding new engineers is faster now. CodeCat explains why something is bad, not just that it is.
Sophie Martin
@smartin_dev
I stopped dreading code review. CodeCat handles the tedious pattern checks and I focus on logic.
Marcus Webb
@marcuswebb
The architecture reviewer flagged a circular dependency we'd been ignoring for months. Game changer.
James Liu
@jamesliu
It found 3 accessibility violations in a component I thought was clean. The explanations are actionable.
Alex Thompson
@athompson
The parallel reviewers find issues that a single AI completely misses. The depth is unreal.
Ravi Patel
@ravipatel
It posts comments directly to the PR in the exact format our team uses. Zero context switching.
Marcus Webb
@marcuswebb
The architecture reviewer flagged a circular dependency we'd been ignoring for months. Game changer.
James Liu
@jamesliu
It found 3 accessibility violations in a component I thought was clean. The explanations are actionable.
Alex Thompson
@athompson
The parallel reviewers find issues that a single AI completely misses. The depth is unreal.
Ravi Patel
@ravipatel
It posts comments directly to the PR in the exact format our team uses. Zero context switching.
Simple, transparent pricing
Start for free, upgrade when your team scales.
Frequently Asked Questions
No. We process your PR diffs in memory to generate the review and discard the code immediately. We do not store your source code in our database.